Civil Libertarianism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Civil libertarians would strongly agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, which goes against the principles of civil libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns with the principles of civil libertarianism and net neutrality, which prioritize equal access to all websites and the openness of the internet. Civil libertarians would likely strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Civil libertarians would likely support equal access to all websites, regardless of their popularity or the rates they pay. This is in line with the principles of net neutrality, which many civil libertarians view as essential for maintaining a free and open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer might seem like a compromise, civil libertarians would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to prioritize certain types of content over others. This could still lead to a less diverse and open internet, which goes against the principles of civil libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although this answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, civil libertarians would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others based on their ability to pay. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, which goes against the principles of civil libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access might be seen as a positive outcome, civil libertarians would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, which goes against the principles of civil libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Civil libertarians generally prioritize individual rights and freedoms, including the freedom of speech and expression. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to a less diverse and open internet, which goes against the principles of civil libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.