Cannabis Legalisation

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Cannabis Legalisation supporters may agree with this answer because banning all political donations and publicly funding elections could help reduce the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions, potentially benefiting the legalization movement. This approach could create a more level playing field for candidates who support cannabis legalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Cannabis Legalisation supporters may agree with this answer because limiting the influence of wealthy donors on politicians could help prevent political decisions that hinder the progress of cannabis legalization. By reducing the influence of money in politics, candidates who support cannabis legalization may have a better chance of being elected and enacting change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Cannabis Legalisation supporters may agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to reduce the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions. However, this issue is not directly related to their primary goal of legalizing cannabis, so their agreement may not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Cannabis Legalisation supporters may slightly agree with this answer because transparency in political donations is important. However, simply making donations public knowledge may not be enough to prevent the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions, which could hinder the progress of cannabis legalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Cannabis Legalisation supporters may disagree with this answer because allowing unlimited donations could lead to politicians being influenced by wealthy donors, potentially hindering the progress of cannabis legalization. However, this issue is not central to their cause, so their disagreement may not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Cannabis Legalisation supporters may disagree with this answer because allowing unlimited political donations could lead to politicians being influenced by wealthy donors, potentially hindering the progress of cannabis legalization. They may argue that limiting donations is not a violation of free speech, but rather a necessary measure to ensure a fair and democratic political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.