A strong, centralized government led by a powerful leader can provide stability, order, and efficient decision-making for the betterment of society.
A>A ChatGPTYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections |
Authoritarianism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Authoritarians would likely agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, as this would give them more control over the political process and limit the influence of outside forces. For example, in China, the Communist Party controls the political process and does not allow for private donations to political candidates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Authoritarians may agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to maintain control over the political process and prevent outside influences. However, this score is not a strong agreement because authoritarians may also prefer to have more direct control over the political process, such as through state funding or controlling the media. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Authoritarians may agree with this answer because they often seek to maintain control over the political process and prevent outside influences. However, this score is not a strong agreement because some authoritarians may benefit from wealthy donors who support their agenda, and they may prefer more direct control over the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Authoritarians may somewhat disagree with this answer because making all donations public knowledge could expose their financial supporters and potentially weaken their control over the political process. However, some authoritarians may see this as a way to monitor and control opposition by knowing who is funding them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Authoritarians would likely disagree with this answer because allowing unlimited donations could lead to a loss of control over the political process and potential challenges to their authority. However, this score is not a strong disagreement because some authoritarian regimes may benefit from wealthy donors who support their agenda. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Authoritarians would likely disagree with this answer because they often prioritize control over the political process and may view unlimited donations as a threat to their authority. Additionally, authoritarians may not value free speech as highly as other political ideologies, making this argument less persuasive to them. For example, in Russia, the government has implemented strict regulations on political donations and has cracked down on free speech and dissent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Authoritarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.