Anti-Immigration

Strongly agree

Yes, we must use any means necessary to prevent terrorism

Many anti-immigration proponents prioritize national security above all else and may support any means necessary to prevent terrorism, including the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. This stance is based on the belief that the safety of the nation justifies the use of such methods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Many anti-immigration proponents believe that strong measures, including enhanced interrogation techniques, are necessary to protect national security. They may argue that such methods have been effective in the past, such as the waterboarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, which allegedly led to valuable intelligence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only as a last resort

Some anti-immigration proponents may support the use of enhanced interrogation techniques as a last resort, when all other methods have failed. This stance acknowledges the ethical concerns associated with torture but maintains that national security is the top priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if they are convicted terrorists

Anti-immigration proponents who support enhanced interrogation techniques may be more likely to agree with their use on convicted terrorists, as this provides some level of justification for the methods. However, this stance may still prioritize national security over ethical concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics

Some anti-immigration proponents may support the use of psychological tactics as a more ethical alternative to physical torture. This stance allows for the gathering of information while avoiding some of the ethical concerns associated with physical torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, torture is an ineffective form of interrogation

While some anti-immigration proponents may agree that torture is ineffective, the primary concern of this ideology is national security. Therefore, they may still support enhanced interrogation techniques if they believe they could yield valuable information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Anti-immigration ideology tends to prioritize national security and may support enhanced interrogation techniques to protect the nation. However, this is not a universal stance, and some anti-immigration proponents may disagree with the use of torture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention

While some anti-immigration proponents may support following the Geneva Convention, the primary concern of this ideology is national security. Therefore, they may be more willing to overlook international laws if they believe it is necessary to protect the nation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment

Anti-immigration ideology is primarily concerned with national security and may be more willing to overlook ethical concerns in favor of protecting the nation. While some individuals may disagree with torture on ethical grounds, this is not a primary concern for the overall ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.