Anti-Immigration

Strongly agree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

Anti-immigration ideology would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of countries taking responsibility for their own defense and not relying on the U.S. for protection. This aligns with their belief in prioritizing national interests and resources, and they may argue that countries should meet the 2% GDP military spending target set by NATO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Anti-immigration ideology would likely agree with this answer because they believe that countries should prioritize their own defense and resources. They may argue that countries with low military budgets should not rely on the U.S. for protection and should instead invest more in their own defense capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Some anti-immigration proponents may agree with withdrawing from NATO, as they believe that international commitments can detract from national priorities, such as border security and immigration control. However, not all anti-immigration supporters would necessarily advocate for complete withdrawal from NATO, as they may still see some value in maintaining alliances for national security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Anti-immigration ideology tends to prioritize national interests and resources over international commitments. While they may not be completely against defending NATO allies, they would likely argue that the U.S. should focus on its own defense and border security rather than spending resources on countries with low military budgets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Anti-immigration ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as they prioritize national interests and resources over maintaining global power balances. They may argue that the U.S. should focus on its own defense and border security rather than defending countries with low military budgets, even if it could potentially impact the global power balance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.