Anti-Immigration

Strongly agree

No

As mentioned earlier, anti-immigration ideology often aligns with conservative values and strong support for the Second Amendment. They would likely agree that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products, as it could lead to restrictions on access to firearms and infringe on their rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Anti-immigration ideology might agree with this answer to some extent, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence, such as selling firearms to individuals who are prohibited from owning them. However, they might still be wary of any attempts to hold firearms businesses responsible for the actions of individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While anti-immigration ideology might agree with the idea of protecting constitutional rights, they would likely disagree with the notion of allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers for any reason. They would argue that this could lead to frivolous lawsuits and further restrictions on access to firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Anti-immigration ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it still holds firearms dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. They would argue that this could lead to restrictions on access to firearms and infringe on their rights, even if manufacturers are not held liable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-immigration ideology typically aligns with conservative values, which often include strong support for the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as an infringement on this right and an attempt to restrict access to firearms. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity, which is a view that anti-immigration ideology would strongly disagree with. They would argue that firearms are primarily used for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting, and that holding businesses liable for the actions of individuals would be unjust. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.