Anti-Globalization

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with anti-globalization ideology, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. Such practices could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would further concentrate power and wealth in the hands of a few corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Anti-globalization supporters advocate for equal opportunities and access for all, regardless of their financial power. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for everyone, including smaller businesses and marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with anti-globalization ideology, as it promotes equal access and opportunities for all, regardless of their financial power. This approach helps to prevent the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few corporations and supports a more diverse and democratic internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests prioritizing traffic by type rather than source, it still allows for the possibility of ISPs giving preferential treatment to certain content. Anti-globalization ideology opposes practices that could lead to the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few corporations, and this approach could still disadvantage smaller websites and marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model would still allow ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others based on their financial power, which goes against anti-globalization ideology. This approach could lead to a less diverse and less democratic internet, as smaller websites and marginalized communities may not be able to afford the higher rates required for faster access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-globalization ideology opposes the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few corporations. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would further empower large corporations and disadvantage smaller websites, leading to a less diverse and less democratic internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Although this answer suggests that the internet would become faster and more reliable for users, it still promotes the idea of prioritizing certain websites over others based on their financial power. Anti-globalization ideology opposes such practices, as they contribute to the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.