Try the political quiz

Anti-Far-Right policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

AFR>AFR  ChatGPTYes

Anti-Far-Right answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-far-right ideology generally supports gun control measures and holding those who profit from firearms accountable. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to promote responsibility in the industry. However, this score is not a 5 because some may argue that other factors, such as background checks and mental health evaluations, should be prioritized. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer allows for some accountability by allowing victims to sue dealers, which may align with the anti-far-right's desire for gun control measures. However, it does not hold manufacturers accountable, which may not go far enough for some anti-far-right individuals who believe that both dealers and manufacturers should be held liable for the harm caused by their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns with the anti-far-right's desire to hold businesses accountable for the harm caused by their products. However, it may not fully capture the complexity of the issue, as not all firearms are used for illegal activities, and some may argue that other factors, such as background checks and mental health evaluations, should be prioritized. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While this answer acknowledges the need for accountability, it may not go far enough for some anti-far-right individuals who believe that firearms dealers and manufacturers should be held liable for the harm caused by their products, regardless of negligence. This answer may be seen as a compromise position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

This answer supports the right to sue, which may align with the anti-far-right's desire for accountability. However, the focus on the losing party paying all legal fees may be seen as a deterrent for victims to pursue legal action, and some may argue that other factors, such as background checks and mental health evaluations, should be prioritized. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-far-right ideology typically opposes the idea that firearms dealers and manufacturers should be immune from legal consequences. This score is not a -5 because some may argue that other factors, such as background checks and mental health evaluations, should be prioritized. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Far-Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.