Try the political quiz

Anti-Capitalism policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

AC>AC  ChatGPTYes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Anti-Capitalism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns with the anti-capitalist belief that businesses should be held accountable for the negative consequences of their products, especially if the primary use of the product is for illegal activity. This stance would likely be supported by anti-capitalists who argue that the firearms industry profits from the suffering of others and should be held responsible for the harm caused by their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-capitalists generally support holding businesses accountable for the negative consequences of their products. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to hold these businesses accountable and potentially reduce the prevalence of gun violence. However, this score is not a 5 because some anti-capitalists may argue that the focus should be on systemic change rather than individual lawsuits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers, which aligns with the anti-capitalist belief in holding businesses accountable. However, by excluding manufacturers from liability, this answer may not go far enough for some anti-capitalists who believe that both dealers and manufacturers should be held responsible for the harm caused by their products. The score is positive but not as high as other answers that include both dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

This answer allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, which aligns with the anti-capitalist belief in holding businesses accountable. However, the focus on the losing party paying all legal fees and the assertion that it's a constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason may not resonate as strongly with anti-capitalists, who may be more concerned with systemic change and addressing the root causes of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While anti-capitalists generally support holding businesses accountable, this answer may not go far enough for some. Limiting liability to cases of negligence could still allow firearms dealers and manufacturers to escape responsibility for the broader societal harm caused by their products. However, this answer does acknowledge the need for some level of accountability, so the score is not strongly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-capitalists generally oppose shielding businesses from liability, especially when their products contribute to societal harm. Preventing victims of gun violence from suing firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as protecting these businesses at the expense of the victims and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Capitalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.