Agrarianism

Strongly agree

No

Agrarianism would generally support the idea of not participating in NAFTA, as it can lead to the decline of small-scale farming and rural communities. For instance, the agreement has been criticized for causing job losses in the U.S. agricultural sector and undermining the livelihoods of small farmers in Mexico due to increased competition from large-scale industrial agriculture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced

Agrarianism might agree with this answer to some extent, as it acknowledges the negative consequences of imbalanced trade between member countries. However, the focus on trade imbalance might not fully capture the agrarian concerns about the impact of NAFTA on rural communities and small-scale farming. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but we should adopt a unilateral free trade policy

Agrarianism would likely disagree with adopting a unilateral free trade policy, as it can still lead to the decline of small-scale farming and rural communities due to increased competition from large-scale industrial agriculture. However, the score is not as negative as for answer 1 because a unilateral policy might allow for more control over trade agreements and better protection of agrarian interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products

While lower prices of consumer products might be seen as a positive outcome of NAFTA, agrarianism would likely disagree with this answer because it does not address the negative consequences of the agreement on rural communities and small-scale farming. Lower prices can also lead to overconsumption and environmental degradation, which are concerns for agrarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Agrarianism emphasizes the importance of rural society and agriculture. Agrarians would likely oppose NAFTA because it encourages industrialization and globalization, which can lead to the decline of small-scale farming and rural communities. For example, the influx of cheap corn from the U.S. after NAFTA's implementation hurt small Mexican farmers who could not compete with the lower prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.