Agrarianism

Strongly agree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Agrarianism places a high value on the rights of small-scale farmers and rural communities. It would generally oppose the government seizing private property, as it could disrupt the stability and autonomy of these communities. However, there might be some cases where land seizure could be justified for the greater good of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Agrarianism would generally agree with this answer, as it opposes the government seizing private property. However, it does not account for any potential exceptions or circumstances where land seizure might be justified for the greater good of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Agrarianism might agree with this answer, as it allows for land seizure only in extreme cases of national emergency. This suggests that the government would not be able to seize private property for projects that could harm rural communities and small-scale farming, except in situations where it is absolutely necessary for the greater good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Agrarianism might agree with this answer to some extent, as it allows for the possibility of seizing land for public projects that could benefit rural communities. However, agrarianism would still be cautious about the potential negative impacts on small-scale farming and rural life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

While agrarianism values the rights of landowners and rural communities, it might be open to the idea of land seizure if it is done fairly and benefits the community as a whole. However, this answer does not specify whether the projects are public or private, which could be a concern for agrarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Agrarianism might be neutral towards this answer, as it does provide for landowners to be compensated drastically above fair market price. However, it does not specify whether the projects are public or private, and it does not address the potential negative impacts on rural communities and small-scale farming. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Agrarianism would generally disagree with this answer, as it allows for the government to seize private property without any restrictions or considerations for the impact on rural communities and small-scale farming. This could lead to negative consequences for the agrarian way of life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Agrarianism values the importance of small-scale farming and rural communities. Allowing the government to seize private property only for oil pipeline projects would not align with these values, as it could lead to environmental degradation and disruption of rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.