American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 4hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 300 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Republicans in Congress made it clear Thursday that they will not be moving quickly to bring up new gun control legislation in t...” ‐usatoday.com
Very strongly agree
No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
James has consistently emphasized the importance of due process and the rights of law-abiding citizens to own firearms. He would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone
James has expressed concerns about potential infringements on Second Amendment rights. He would likely agree with the sentiment that banning gun sales to people on the no-fly list could lead to broader restrictions.
Agree
No
James has consistently advocated for the rights of law-abiding citizens to own firearms. He would likely agree with this statement, but with the caveat that due process must be respected. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process
James might agree with this statement to some extent, as it acknowledges the importance of due process. However, he has not publicly supported specific restrictions on gun purchases for people on the no-fly list. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
While James might agree with the logic of this statement, he has consistently emphasized the importance of due process and the rights of law-abiding citizens to own firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
John James is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has not publicly supported outright bans on gun purchases for specific groups without due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone
James is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has not supported broad bans on gun and ammunition sales. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,219 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
