Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MMD6HL from North Carolina answered…19hrs19H

Yes, but only in terms of preventing disease, disorders, and significant health issues. This should not be applied to ph…

  2

 @9MMZWFR from North Carolina answered…4mins4m

no because that can make us sick and our odys can change

 @9MMZL73 from Minnesota answered…15mins15m

Somewhat. I believe that this technology should be regulated and ONLY used for terminal diseases or something similar.

 @9MMZ7PD from Minnesota answered…27mins27m

It depends on how the meat was made. If the meat is safe to eat then they can regulate it.

 @9MMY8BQ from Oregon answered…59mins59m

Yes. This sounds like humans trying to play God. Kind of like Frankenstein.

 @9MMY3YN from North Carolina answered…1hr1H

If the person has a diseases like sickle-cell anemia then yes, but if it just for personal gain then no.

 @9MMY3BY from Arkansas answered…1hr1H

No, but if it's important or dangerous, have exceptions for plausible reasons. Religious, maybe certain allergens, etc.

 @9MMY27H from California answered…1hr1H

Yes, I believe it’s important for Darwinism to happen and for natural selection to happen

 @9MMXP2D from Pennsylvania answered…1hr1H

CRISPR shouldn’t even be a thing. The government should regulate it to where it doesn’t get out of control.

 @9MMWPQ8 from Michigan answered…2hrs2H

If it is used within safe and ethical boundaries then I think it is ok to proceed.

 @9MMW4Z8 from Michigan answered…2hrs2H

Depending on the exact modifications it is being used for

 @9K99V29 from Florida answered…3hrs3H

Yes, but not without strict regulation and research

 @9MMRW4T from North Carolina answered…4hrs4H

Wait to see what the long-term health effects are.

 @9MMRPXL from North Carolina answered…4hrs4H

I think an increase would be beneficial but I also believe that money could be used to find more out about our planet, l…

 @9MMQPLY from Indiana answered…5hrs5H

Regardless, things like food shouldn’t be commodities to be commercialized in the first place

 @9MMQ8BG from Massachusetts answered…5hrs5H

There should be no genetic modifications to human DNA

 @SenBR2003from New York  answered…16hrs16H

Yes, but companies should be required to label packages containing lab-grown meat.

 @9MMBZ6F from California answered…19hrs19H

Resources found in space should be used to help humanity! And I hate every single right wing person alive who even sligh…

  @Jcawolfson from Pennsylvania answered…20hrs20H

Yes, but there must be some oversight to ensure food safety, and we mustn’t permit false advertising

 @9MM8DLV from Arkansas answered…21hrs21H

If your in a densely populated area you should be vaccinated but if you live in the middle of nowhere you don't have to…

 @9MM6SDX from Wisconsin answered…22hrs22H

Only if they are used in medical ways, not to make designer babies

 @9MM6S2C from Indiana answered…22hrs22H

Yes, if it doesn't pose a dangerous threat to society or evolution in general

 @9MM6GLY from California answered…23hrs23H

Yes, but each state should be informed of the pros and cons of voting for it.

 @9MM6GLY from California answered…23hrs23H

Yes, but each state should vote on many of the regulations.