This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
@9NCVR3K4hrs4H
Yes, or else the cause of accidents will be defended as “technological errors” instead of human negligence.
@9N7VJLY3 days3D
Yes, only allowing for accident preventative measures. Increase funding towards public transportation
@9MTZNC41wk1W
Only restrict until safety concerns are adequately addressed
@9MNDH7D2wks2W
Is the government cared about people being self reliant theyd get rid of the welfare state.
@9MMZQM42wks2W
Yes, but promote assistive features that improve the humans ability to do the task
@9MMY3YN2wks2W
I feel that the should not control, but for those with special needs could use this tech so that they can travel.
@JcawolfsonIndependent 2wks2W
No, unless it is the decision of local/state government - with consent of the governed. Safety must be prioritized, though innovation must be allowed.
@SenBR2003 2wks2W
No, but require car companies to design vehicles so that users have the option to exert full human control over their vehicles.
@9MM5PH42wks2W
Yes, If it distracts the drivers ability to drive carefully to avoid accidents and distracted driving.
@9MM3CYD2wks2W
Somewhat yes and no because it depends on who wants to buy advanced or not.
@9MLZQLY2wks2W
I think that Ai in control of a car isnt a bad idea because it could prevent a good handful of accidents.
@Dry550Independent 2wks2W
Yes, a limit can potentially save human lives. Placing a cap on what technology can control is not hindering progress, it’s covering all bases
@9MLV5S4Women’s Equality2wks2W
I think that there are some features that should be taken out of cars and some that should stay for safety reasons
@9MLTK9D2wks2W
I think for now it should stay the way it is. If there's(re) any problem in the future they can think about it later.
@9MLQSBB2wks2W
Not really, human error is what causes car accidents like not breaking in time, not checking a mirror for a blind spot, or not precisely controlling the car. Since there's only so much a human can do, technology in vehicles can help reduce the chances of a car accident
No, but strictly regulate it to ensure maximum safety
Yes, in cases where it makes sense, while simultaneously pursuing the development of technology that can increase safety for humans
@9MLJ772 2wks2W
No, but technology implemented should be well-tested.
@9MLGYQ92wks2W
Regulate not restrict-add safeguards, not stifle innovation
@9MLGS342wks2W
Depends the specific thing advanced technology is assisting with, and the advancement of technology in vehicles in the near future
@9J2LX9L 2wks2W
Yes, only for now until we can fully work out the kinks.
@9MKXSMQLibertarian2wks2W
No, the government should not restrict a free market
@9MKWNW42wks2W
There should always be a human ready to take over should the advanced technology fail, and there should be a manual/switch option in case of screen failures.
@9MKW7MG2wks2W
Yes and no depends on the tech they put into the vehicle. I'm against them shutting off their car, but some tech suits vehicles.
@9MKQ5Z72wks2W
Technology to utilized for emergency or that is needed for when humans are unable to react in a timely fashion
While this could help prevent harm, advanced technology, and cars could also help people stay safe from harm.
@9MKLQMR2wks2W
yes, at least until we have sufficiently advanced technology that it can be used safely and without endangering human lives.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
