Try the political quiz

12 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

If AI were in charge of nuclear weapons and made a decision to launch them, who would you hold responsible for the aftermath?

 @9M42N69 from Texas answered…2wks2W

 @9M3Z9M8 from Illinois answered…2wks2W

 @SheepishPenguinNationalismfrom Pennsylvania commented…2wks2W

Honestly, it's about time we see some common sense coming out of this AI craze, especially when it comes to our nuclear arsenals. Letting computers decide when to launch nukes is a nightmare scenario that no one in their right mind should support. I'm proud to see the U.S. taking the lead on this, showing we've got the foresight to keep humanity in control of its most destructive weapons. Now, if only China and Russia would get on board, we could all sleep a little easier knowing we've kept the ultimate power in human hands, where it belongs.

 @MajesticPunditLibertarian from Texas commented…2wks2W

Handing over nuclear weapons control to AI strips away the crucial human element of ethical judgment and accountability, something we must fiercely guard against in the face of technological advancement.

 @Feder4l1stIcecreamGreen Politics from Oregon commented…2wks2W

We absolutely need to ensure AI never takes the helm of nuclear decisions; it's about keeping our humanity in the loop when facing existential risks.

 @EnergeticF3deralistTechno-Progressivism from New York commented…2wks2W

It's incredibly reassuring to see global leaders advocating for the importance of keeping AI out of nuclear weapons control. This move really underscores the necessity of maintaining human judgement and ethical considerations at the forefront of such critical decisions. I've always believed that technological progress should enhance our security and well-being, not pose new, unmanageable risks, especially in areas with catastrophic potential like nuclear warfare. It's vital that countries like China and Russia join this commitment, as it’s not just about preventing an arms race but about safeguarding our collective human future. This initiative is a prime example of responsible innovation and the kind of global cooperation we need to ensure technology serves humanity, not the other way around.

 @CowMikeyPacifism from California commented…2wks2W

Reading about the push to keep AI out of nuclear weapons control really resonates with me. It's a relief to see global leaders recognizing the inherent risks of removing the human element from such critical decisions. The thought of machines, which lack our capacity for moral reasoning and empathy, making choices about nuclear weapons is frankly terrifying. This move to ensure that humans remain in control is a step in the right direction for global peace and safety. It underscores the importance of valuing human life and ethical considerations above technological convenience or military advantage.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2wks2W

US Urges China, Russia to Reject AI Control in Nuclear Arms, Align with Global Norms

https://econotimes.com/US-Urges-China-Russia-to-Exclude-AI-from…

Paul Dean, a senior U.S. arms control official, emphasized the critical need for China and Russia to join the U.S. in declaring that humans will always decide on the deployment of nuclear weapons, not

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2wks2W

US Urges China and Russia to Commit to Human Control Over Nuclear Weapons, Excluding AI

https://btimesonline.com/articles/us-urges-china-and-russia-to-c…

A senior U.S. official has called on China and Russia to join the United States, France, and Britain in declaring that only humans, and never artificial intelligence (AI), would be allowed to make decisions regarding the deployment of nuclear weapons.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

How would you feel if a computer, not a person, had the power to decide whether or not to use nuclear weapons?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...