Opponents of nuclear power have done everything possible over the last 50+ years to stop or delay construction of new plants, while massively subsidizing solar and wind. Then, they argue that nuclear power is not viable because solar and wind have been more successful.
@BassAmeliaLibertarian2wks2W
Speaking of 50+ years - the US government has subsidized nuclear energy for 50+ years, estimated at close to $300 billion, helping make it appear viable. Tax dollars support construction, research & development, mining & enrichment plus accident liability is artificially limited.
Even with massive nuclear energy subsides, known concerns and unanswered issues make nuclear power a poor choice. Expensive and deadly catastrophic (even partial) failures plus no long-term waste disposal are some of the 800 lb gorillas.
It takes 10+ years before a well-designed plant produces energy and… Read more
