The following is a 4 message exchange between 4 users
@SolemnGnuNo Labels3mos3MO
I honestly don’t even understand the hesitation on voting for this. In what world is it ok to allow an addict access to more drugs?? It’s like allowing anorexics to keep starving themselves because it’s “free will” or cutters to more knives so they keep cutting..!
The real question is: what impact will Prop F have? All available evidence from prior policies shows it will discourage poor + homeless people from getting life sustaining aid and will in fact make MORE people homeless. This is a totally counter productive measure, Vote NO on F!
@SolemnGnuNo Labels3mos3MO
Actually, it will have the opposite effect and send a message regionally that San Francisco isn't the drug mecca of California anymore.
Pass it we have been saying for years to drug test those on government benefits. If you can afford drugs and alcohol you can afford to do so without the aid of the American taxpayers. We have to pass drug tests to go to work, you can to get welfare.
