Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestions4mos ago

If pets could be embraced by a whole community rather than owned by individuals, how would you engage with animals?

7 Replies

 @9JS55MV  from Texas answered…4mos4MO

i would learn when and what i need to do to keep that pet healthy put my money forward for feed, vet visits etc.

 @9JVKRFXIndependent from Wisconsin disagreed…4mos4MO

I believe if the whole community owns the pets and holds them in a specific place they wouldn't get enough attention with work life and jobs and that place would end up more like a pound. It would be a playground that no one uses or used little and the pets wouldn't form bonds with an owner which is what makes a pet so special. Also your comment doesn't make sense towards the question you are talking about owning the pet putting your money forward not the communities like in the question.

 @9JS8R4B from Missouri disagreed…4mos4MO

If pets are there for a whole community to enjoy as opposed to a single person/household, it destroys the individual connection you have with the animal.

 @9JS6BFQ from Maine answered…4mos4MO

I would have to make sure the animals is safe then, i can embrace the animal.

 @9JS7YCW from Illinois agreed…4mos4MO

I think that you should make sure there isn't anything wrong with the animal and then you can embrace the animal to make sure you don't get yourself hurt.

 @9JS67NLRepublicananswered…4mos4MO

I wouldn't care to engage with animals that aren't mine.

 @9JS6DVY from Illinois answered…4mos4MO

pets are cute, I'd still pet them and keep them entertained.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...