I've diligently read all of your rants against old TruthHurts101, and I have to ask why on earth you even care what ever people believe in if you do not believe in a God or higher power of any kind? Why does it matter to you? If other people can find meaning and value in religion why'd o you feel an obligation to intrude? It doesn't affect you. And yet you just either spent 3 hrs typing this up or asked ChatGPT to do it for you. Why invest all the time and effort when it doesn't affect you? I'm just asking.
@VulcanMan6 5mos5MO
Well the first reason is because I use this site to pass the time while I'm at work, so taking hours of my time to write and respond to people like this is perfectly fine by me, preferable even. The second reason is because I just love debating ideas and engaging in discourse, even stupid discourse that I've heard and disproved a dozen times before; I just enjoy the mental stimulation. The third reason is because the stuff this guy is trying to argue and spread as fact is blatantly false (and that includes all the other political and socio-economic garbage he also advocates), and… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
How is it bad for society? You never addressed that? How is people believing in objective morality, a Higher Law, a Heaven, and a God who gives them purpose BAD for society? If anything that would be good! Even if that belief is "blatantly false" as you claim, why does it affect you if certain people derive meaning from Christianity? It doesn't at all.
@VulcanMan6 5mos5MO
I didn't say that "believing in objective morality or a god/religion" is bad for society, I said that "promoting religious beliefs/values as objective facts over actual science" is bad for society. This is bad for society because doing so is actively promoting misinformation and denying actual evidence, thus creating a society of people who value belief instead of truth.
Of course, this isn't a problem when people who hold religious beliefs accept that their beliefs are based on faith, as well as do not utilize their religious beliefs against others. And for most… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution4mos4MO
This is hilariously fallacious. Your argument is that religious fanatics are spreading "misinformation" which is begging the question and assuming the point you're already trying to make. It's a vicious circle and utterly illogical.
@9CJ6CB64mos4MO
Illogical is promoting one person’s god over another with about the same amount of evidence. Illogical is denying what we do know for something that Christians only hope is real. Illogical is spreading proven lies over and over and claiming god is on your side.
@VulcanMan6 4mos4MO
No actually it is quite simple: things that are objectively true require empirical evidence to support it, therefore promoting things as objectively true that are NOT supported by empirical evidence is propagating misinformation. Your religious beliefs on the world, such as young-earth creationism, are both 1) not supported by any empirical evidence, AND 2) contradicted and refuted by all the empirical evidence that we do currently have. Promoting something that is not only unproven, but also DISPROVEN by empirical evidence, as if it was an objective fact is misinformation in every sense of the word.
If YOU want everyone else to accept your claims, then the burden of proof is on YOU to provide that empirical evidence to prove it. That is how science and reality works...