Try the political quiz

2 Replies

 @9GG2P7MLibertarian from Arizona agreed…6mos6MO

It would be illogical to sue the company who made the product because someone used it in a way the manufacturer did not intend. Many things from a dog bone to a HDMI cable can be used in illegal and dangerous ways, but no one would want to then sue the company who made them because someone used their product in a way they did not intend their product to be used. The same logic would apply to firearm manufacturers.

 @6WP5FSYRepublican from Washington commented…5mos5MO

Firearm manufactures do not intend their firearms to be used in mass shootings. If they make military weapons they intend it to be used by military organizations. If they make civilian weapons they intend them to be used on shooting ranges, collections, or for hunting.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity4 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active inPartyRepublicanLocationUnknown