Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
The following is a 3 message exchange between 2 users
@9FVGK4N 8mos8MO
A gun's primary purpose is supposedly for hunting according to gun advocates, so if is not being used for that purpose then gun manufacturers should be held liable for their misuse to make sure they have a stake in how their products are being used.
@9FWQ7K97mos7MO
Guns aren’t just made for hunting. The 2nd amendment is for defence against criminals and and tyrants. It does not talk about hunting . The argument that you couldn’t use them against a tyrannical government is stupid in my opinion, The Taliban and the Vietcong beat the U.S military with worse and less modern small Arms.
@9FVGK4N 7mos7MO
The 2nd Amendment specifically mentions having a "well-regulated militia". Also those who support the 2nd Amendment are perfectly fine with tyrannical policies.
