If someone misuses a vehicle in a malicious way to harm others, the vehicle manufacturer isn’t held liable, so why should a firearms manufacturer be held liable?
@9FF2Q9G8mos8MO
Car manufacturers don't just give the public the fanciest or dangerous cars, they are reserved. Gun manufacturers should not be creating assault grade weapons for the public.
@6WP5FSYRepublican 5mos5MO
“Gun manufacturers should not be creating assault grade weapons for the public.”
They don't make assault grade weapons for the public. No modern developed military is using a semi-automatic weapon.
@9GKKKN26mos6MO
as per the 2nd amendment, giving me the right to a well regulated militia in the case of fighting for free state, and the right to bear and keep arms, i am 100% entitled to owning a assault grade weapon. If i fall off of a ladder and break my back, i have no right to sue the ladder company. On the other side, if a gun goes off with no fault of the owner, then i can see a lawsuit. People like you are a cancer to our free society, you do no research and make irrational, emotional, and baseless claims. If you took 2 seconds and did a quick google search, you will find that said weapons make up… Read more
@9FF2HC3Libertarian8mos8MO
yes this is a great analogy to describe this issue. people can kill others with a car just as easily as they can with a gun.
The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
