Try the political quiz

12.9k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

No

 @9GS769Q from Arkansas agreed…5mos5MO

We should not do animal testing, it is cruelty for our own benefit. Only animals that produce food should be harmed not animals who don't for no reason.

 @9GT9X2H from Indiana agreed…5mos5MO

Depending on what u use to test the animals they could die and ur basically a murderer and animal abuser and you would be killing that animal for no reason.

 @9FLRDWHWomen’s Equality from Indiana agreed…7mos7MO

-It’s unethical to sentence 100 million thinking + feeling animals to life in a laboratory cage and causing them pain, loneliness, and fear.

-The National Institutes of Health reports that 95 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans.
It’s all very wasteful.

-Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for cures because the results mislead experimenters and waste money, time, and other resources that could be spent on human relevant research. Animal experiments are so worthless that up to half of them are never published.

-The world doesn’t need another stupid funded test on animals so that an experimenter can continue riding the grant gravy train that they are receiving.

 @9FBKQ6TWomen’s Equality from Tennessee agreed…7mos7MO

dont test things on animals they are living things like we are. they have a life and they need to live their life.

 @SomberCapitalistGreenfrom Minnesota disagreed…7mos7MO

Many life-saving treatments and vaccines, such as the polio vaccine, have been developed thanks to animal testing.

Let's take the case of insulin, for example. Before the discovery of insulin, diabetes was a fatal disease. Dogs played a crucial role in the discovery and development of insulin in the early 20th century. Without animal testing, we wouldn't have this life-saving treatment for diabetes that benefits millions of humans today.

Whilst I understand and deeply respect your point, I ask you to consider this: If not animals, then what alternative do you propose to ensure the safety and effectiveness of new medical treatments and vaccines?

 @9GRFGB6 from Texas commented…5mos5MO

No

Criminals if you want to use living beings so much, animals are innocent living beings, criminals are not

 @9GXT4L4  from Washington disagreed…4mos4MO

That's a massive violation to the 8th amendment. While I do support animal rights, and definitely think it should be limited and heavily regulated to life saving research, preferably as non-invasive as possible, subjecting any human to that kind of treatment is completely contrary to the right to not be subject to cruel and unusual punishment. Not only that, but who do you think this would really affect? Murderers, rapists, and pedophiles; or wrongly convicted individuals and minorities? Personally it depresses me that an animal had to suffer for us to progress in life saving care. But…  Read more

 @9BC2YCK from Illinois agreed…1yr1Y

It is such a cruel practice to test our products on animals. Even Hitler banned it.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

Yes

 @9GSW7SP from Ohio disagreed…5mos5MO

Testing on animals is almost like testing on humans, while, yes, testing on humans would be the only other option, but animals are living things too, they have feelings just like humans do and don't deserve to die because of some test that's being conducted on them when they don't even get any form of a say in it

 @9GP32F9 from Illinois disagreed…6mos6MO

I say no beacue thats animal abuse and isn't right. It could harm animals and we need animals in the world.

 @9GRVYDRdisagreed…5mos5MO

If you had acid poured on you almost everyday of you short life, how would you feel? Now think about how those animals feel.

 @9GQMT5J from West Virginia disagreed…5mos5MO

animals have no way of saying how they feel and are forced to do testing they shouldn't be put through

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

Yes, but not for cosmetics

 @9FMLZRNDemocrat from Indiana disagreed…7mos7MO

Animals are beings of nature, just as we are and just as we have been since the beginning of time. You wouldn’t want to see your family pet be abused and poked and prodded with needles, so why are these other animals any different? Why shouldn’t we practice on other humans, wouldn’t that show how makeup and devices and other things work on human skin or how well they work with humans better than animals?

 @9FLS446 from Ohio disagreed…7mos7MO

No animals are living beings and should not be subjected to testing that could kill them and they can't consent to it. Animals are living breathing beings and should not be treated like inanimate objects that are only here to benefit humans.

 @9FMHPCFWomen’s Equality from North Carolina disagreed…7mos7MO

I feel we should not test any product on any animals I feel we should test them on the criminals on death row, the criminals that have been given live sentence. Because the animals don't desurve to be tested on.

 @9FLRDWHWomen’s Equality from Indiana disagreed…7mos7MO

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Animals do not naturally get the diseases that humans do. Such as types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease or schizophrenia. Signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mock the human disease. These experiments belittle the human conditions which are affected by wide ranges of variables. (Ex: genetics and psychological issues)

 @8M2N46D from Missouri answered…3yrs3Y

No, not for cosmetics. Drugs should only be tested on animals if it is believed that the drug could improve the animal's health.

 @89S67K7Independent from Kansas answered…4yrs4Y

No, use inmates that are serving life or death sentences and offer incentives for other inmates to volunteer.

 @9B3BGKK from Oregon answered…1yr1Y

 @8PW2KJP  from Louisiana answered…3yrs3Y

Yes Yes, but not for cosmetics

Yes, animal testing is necessary for understanding the safety and proper dosages of new medicines and treatments. It would be dangerous and extremely unethical for scientists to test drugs on humans before making sure they are safe. Even though the testing might be harmful to the tested animal, I believe its sacrifice advances developments on medicine that could save millions of lives, both human and not.

 @99GH9PQfrom Maine disagreed…1yr1Y

Easy for you to say; you're not the one being sacrificed. If human lives are at stake then test on humans. You'll get better results and the medical industries will be forced to rethink and reduce their exploitative methods. In any event animals don't belong to us to do as we please.

 @9HKRSQP  from Massachusetts answered…4mos4MO

Yes but only if the testing is not torture, sexual, or harmful. It must be done quickly and safely. Animals should be released after testing and taken care of. Also, animal testing should not be used in cosmetics.

 @9DDDH6X from Indiana answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but should be held to a high standard in caring for them and no cruelty

 @9BLK65R from North Carolina answered…12mos12MO

No, not for cosmetics. Drugs should only be tested on animals if it is truly believed that the drug could improve the animal's health.

 @983Y744 from Florida answered…1yr1Y

 @8X4795JRepublican from New Hampshire answered…2yrs2Y

 @9HB5MKV from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but never for superficial discoveries and only if the animals suffer zero pain or distress whatsoever

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...